Saturday, 18 June 2016
Monday, 16 May 2016
In his article (“What Labour can learn from my victory”, News, last week), Sadiq Khan said that we “must be able to persuade people who previously voted Conservative that Labour can be trusted with the economy and security as well as improving public services and creating a fairer society”. He spoke of Labour needing to “be a big tent that appeals to everyone – not just its own activists”. It was refreshing that he referenced those who run their own business as well as nurses.
When I and other so-called “moderates” in the party have made such points we have been labelled “disloyal” and told to show “unity”. It is therefore an important step on the road back to credibility as a political force that a politician of such stature, who has just won a historic victory and who has the biggest electoral mandate in Europe, is pointing out what are the obvious truths of British politics.
In the last parliament, Pragmatic Radicalism held events that brought together people from different parts of the party, and from outside it, to present short policy pitches in an inclusive, outward-looking format. Sadiq chaired one of our events, and Jeremy Corbyn pitched a policy that came second in another event. We cannot win unless we reach out and listen to each other and to the country.
Chair, Pragmatic Radicalism
Tuesday, 5 April 2016
Remembering the brave decision of Prime Minister John Major and President George H W Bush to protect Iraq's Kurds
Monday, 29 February 2016
Beyond the obvious need for additional teaching and other resources, effort is needed to change the attitude in government about what constitutes a good education. At present, there is far too much emphasis on testing, and not enough on encouraging young people to be creative and to learn skills such as acting or playing a musical instrument. It’s these skills that develop well-rounded, confident young people who will be capable of becoming Oscar-winners, or indeed leaders in any field. If more students develop their creative talents, one might say they had received a “comprehensive” education.
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
Friday, 8 January 2016
Monday, 20 July 2015
Sir Ian Kennedy claims (letter, July 17) that Ipsa has been “conscious of the current climate of austerity” when setting MPs’ pay. It seems that this standard has not been applied to his or his senior staff’s remuneration. Ipsa’s last published salaries show the chairman receiving a pro rata salary of £182,000 and several senior managers more than £100,000.
Can it be that working as a senior member of Ipsa’s staff is more important than the work of an MP?